A tad as well pricey
Earlier this week Intel voiced that it has proposed shipping Atom N550 dual-core mobile CPUs. Of course, this is not the initial dual-core Atom, but it is the initial dual-core that can be used in netbooks, with Intels blessing.
Several players have already introduced their initial dual-core netbook designs and nonetheless we have no disbelief the new Atom N550 will broach a poignant opening boost, it appears that dual-core netbooks will be utterly pricey.
Lenovo has starting preorders for the N550-based IdeaPad S10-3 in a little name markets, but the cost seems to be rsther than ridiculous. It facilities an Intel Atom N550 clocked at 1.5GHz, 1GB of mental recall and a 10-inch 1024×600 screen. For a little reason Lenovo is pricing it at AUD 559,98 in the Australian market. This amounts to over 450 US dollars, that creates it rsther than pointless.
Asus on the alternative palm hasnt left as bonkers as Lenovo and it’s charity the in vogue Eee Personal Computer 1015PEM for 349 in the European market. It additionally has 2GB of DDR3, so its rather improved specd than the Lenovo.
Speaking of specs, Gigabytes T1005M automobile inscription beats both the Eee and IdeaPad with the hands down. It facilities a multitouch capacitive 10.1-inch shade in 1366×768. It additionally has 2GB of memory, Express Card slot, USB 3 and eSATA. However, it will sell at close to $800. We contingency note that Gigabyte is aiming at a niche market, so we unequivocally cant call it overpriced.
However, it appears that unchanging netbooks formed on Intels new N550 will be anything but affordable. Judging by a little early listings, many will sell for some-more than 350, that doesnt have them a really great deal. Oddly enough, their greatest foe comes from the same vendors and the same chipmaker, in the guise of small 11.6-inch CULV notebooks. Some have been accessible for about 375 and at only over 400 theres multiform to select from. While they have been a little 10 to twenty percent pricier than N550 netbooks, they additionally suggest bigger screens in 1366×768 and dual-core CULV processors, such as the Celeron SU2300.
All in all, dual-core Atoms have been the approach of the future, but at stream prices they simply dont have most sense.
link